Thursday, October 14, 2010

Electrified nano filter promises to cut costs for clean drinking water

http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/10/13/electrified.nano.filter.promises.cut.costs.clean.drinking.waterAlmost

one billion people do not have access to clean safe water. Scientists are now creating new tests that kills up 98 percent of disease filled bacteria. The scientists have studied that regular purifiers collect the bacteria with tiny pores in filters. By doing this alot of energy is used and these filters get clogged periodicly and need to be cleaned. In the end when the proces is finished it only traps the bacteria and not killing.



Yi Cui and collegues have studied that silver and electricity are both components of killing bacteria. There new plan for the filter would be large pores and allows water to flow through easily. The proces in which they use to filter the proces is as follows. They spread tiny silver nanowires onto cotton then they add a coating of carbon nanotubes. By doing this step it gives extra electricle conduct. Coli tanted water showed that this filter killed up to 98 percent of the disease filled bacteria inside of it. With this new filter it never cloged and could run throught the filter quickly without any pump. The coast of these new filters are very expensive. But in the long run it will coast less to filter things like air food and of course water. The new machines last longer and are more efficient and can lead us into a beter future.





I think we should invest in these filters. If they can take more disease's out of things we have a less chance of getting sick. In the long run it will actually cut down money we have to spend to replace clogged filters. I was amazed that with such huge pores it could filter so well.





1. What percent of bacteria does this filter kill?


2. What two components kill bacteria?


3. Who with the help of his colegues are working on this?


4. About how many people do not have access to clean water?

Chesapeake Bay Cleanup




Summary

For 27 years, 5 states have done almost nothing to help stop phosphorus and nitrogen pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. In fact, they contributed for 70% of all the pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. Algae blooms are happening too, depriving fish and crabs of oxygen, which kills them. Of the 5 states that are polluting the Chesapeake Bay, one of them is our state, Pennsylvania. The other 4 states are Virginia, West Virginia, Delaware, and New York. EPA has given them until November 29th to fix their cleanup plans or else they will raise sewer taxes, causing more property taxes on consumers and businesses. States are complaining that they do not have enough time to change cleanup plans and prevent pollution, but then again, they have been doing almost nothing for the past 27 years but adding to the pollution.








President Barack Obama issued an order for EPA to have more authority with the Chesapeake Bay clean up in May 2009. Since then, EPA has been laying down rules and new target dates to reduce pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. The target date used to be 2000, and the states failed to meet the goals, and yet again in 2010 they did not meet the goals. EPA has set 2025 for the new target goal to meet the mandated pollution goals.






Reflection
I can't believe that this is happening. And it has been happening for the past 27 years. Hopefully, the states will change their plans for waste products and lower pollution in the Chesapeake Bay, or else they will get taxed for what they do, and we will be affected by those taxes too. There is a lot of pollution in the Chesapeake Bay already, and if we continue to contribute waste, think of what will happen to that area. It would probably have a different color and a lot of the trash in the above picture.


Questions

  • When should pollution be reduced to a set goal?
  • Which states were dumping waste into the Chesapeake Bay, contributing to about 70% of all the pollution?
  • How come algae blooms are happening?
  • What is it called when algae deprive fish and other sea life of oxygen, killing them?